Forgery is art.
Art is anything made, altered, or created by people that express certain emotions or things. It can range from bush trimming, to architecture, to cooking food. I don’t think intention matters at all in the case of art. A baby could accidentally knock over a can of pain that splashes into something beautiful. The intention to make that wasn’t there, but it’s still art. Beltracchi intended to make forgeries and profit off of them, but what he ended up making is still art.
I think authenticity doesn’t have any role in art. The idea and execution both play an equal role in defining art. But that’s just how I personally view art. Some people believe that the only thing that matters is the name of the artist, as we saw in the success of Beltracchi’s scheme. For example, if someone is really good at making life-like sketches, that is clearly art but maybe not super creative. But if someone has the idea to melt down a banana and use that to draw an apple, that is more of a crazy idea and a different kind of art than the other example. Art can take on many different forms and the very definition can change from person to person.
The value of art never made sense to me. Art is completely arbitrary, one person could love one painting while someone else thinks it’s terrible. The fact that we’ve assigned so much value to certain artists is crazy. As we saw in the video, most people just bought his paintings because they thought they were original works of famous artists. Only in one case did someone keep his art even knowing it was a “fake”, and I respect that person for buying something he truly liked. Most people believe that the authorship and provenance have more of an impact, which I heavily disagree with. While most artists are famous for a reason, that doesn’t mean we should just base our values off of that.
People make art for loads of different reasons, but that doesn’t affect the fact that it’s still art. I’m sure some painters paint in order to make a living, while others just do it for fun. Neither reason is necessarily wrong, just different. Making anything with deceptive intent is morally wrong but that doesn’t change what it is. For instance, someone could bake cup cakes with laxatives in them and give them to their enemies. While this is a questionable thing to do, the cupcakes are still food. The fake paintings might have lost monetary value when the ruse was discovered, but the actually “artistic value” should stay the same. I think that Beltracchi is definitely an authentic painter as he is insanely talented and can replicate so many styles of painting perfectly.